HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental data: Appendix In Brief Table 2: clarification TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment TRACK Discussion: View Comments Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Lucan, S. C. Articles by Bazemore, A. W. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lucan, S. C. Articles by Bazemore, A. W.

Off the Roadmap? Family Medicine’s Grant Funding and Committee Representation at NIH

¹ Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
² Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
³ Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
⁴ Robert Graham Center, Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Chartered NIH advisory committees with active standing memberships. — = included groups; - - - = excluded groups; BSC = board of scientific counselors, IRG = integrated or initial review group, NAC = national advisory council or board, NIH = National Institutes of Health, PAC = program advisory committee, SEP = special emphasis panel. aSpecial emphasis panels have no standing (or reported) memberships.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Active National Institutes of Health advisory committees and members. FMs=family medicine doctors, FPs=family physicians.