| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md
2 School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Mass
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Barbara Starfield, MD, MPH, FRCGP, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway, Room 452, Baltimore, MD 21205, bstarfie{at}jhsph.edu
PURPOSE The impact of comorbidity on use of primary care and specialty services is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between morbidity burden, comorbid conditions, and use of primary care and specialist services
METHODS The study population was a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries, taken from 1999 Medicare files. We analyzed the number of ambulatory face-to-face patient visits to primary care physicians and specialists for each diagnosis, with each one first considered as the "main" one and then as a comorbid diagnosis to another. Each patient was categorized by extent of total morbidity burden using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Group case-mix system.
RESULTS Higher morbidity burden was associated with more visits to specialists, but not to primary care physicians. Patients with most diagnoses had more visits, both to primary care and specialist physicians for comorbid diagnoses than for the main diagnosis itself. Although patients, especially those with high morbidity burdens, generally made more visits to specialists than to primary care physicians, this finding was not always the case. For patients with 66 diagnoses, primary care visits for those diagnoses exceeded specialist visits in all morbidity burden groups; for patients with 87 diagnoses, specialty visits exceeded primary care visits in all morbidity burden groups.
CONCLUSION In the elderly, a high morbidity burden leads to higher use of specialist physicians, but not primary care physicians, even for patients with common diagnoses not generally considered to require specialist care. This finding calls for a better understanding of the relative roles of generalists and specialists in the US health services system.
Key Words: Comorbidity • primary care use, general/specialist care
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Hughes, K. P. Jordan, G. Rajaratnam, S. Fawcett, and P. Croft Recent changes in general practice morbidity in older people Age Ageing, September 1, 2008; 37(5): 572 - 575. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 U. Kadam, P. Croft, and North Staffordshire GP Consortium Group Clinical multimorbidity and physical function in older adults: a record and health status linkage study in general practice Fam. Pract., October 1, 2007; 24(5): 412 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. E. Schoenberg, H. Kim, W. Edwards, and S. T. Fleming Burden of Common Multiple-Morbidity Constellations on Out-of-Pocket Medical Expenditures Among Older Adults Gerontologist, August 1, 2007; 47(4): 423 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Starfield Threads and Yarns: Weaving the Tapestry of Comorbidity Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2006; 4(2): 101 - 103. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. M. Chen, G. E. Fryer Jr., and T. E. Norris Effects of Comorbidity and Clustering upon Referrals in Primary Care J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2005; 18(6): 449 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Stange Radical Ideas Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2005; 3(4): 369 - 371. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Stange and P. A. Nutting In This Issue: Bursting the Bubble on Chronic Disease Management, the Meaning of Healing, PBRN Methods Supplement, and the Annals' 2-Year Anniversary Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2005; 3(3): 194 - 196. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all TRACK Comments
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
